Most types of businesses need to purchase things to function, whether that’s a greengrocer buying vegetables or a manufacturing plant investing in new machinery. Regardless of the scale, industry, or value, these transactions form part of a strategic process called procurement.
Procurement is the act of identifying, sourcing, and negotiating the terms for the goods or services a business needs to operate. When handled well, it can help organisations control costs, reduce risk, and build stronger supplier relationships. When handled poorly, it can lead to weak contracts, unreliable suppliers, and avoidable costs.
Procurement is the business process organisations use to acquire goods, services, or works from external sources. This can cover anything from office equipment and software to consultancy, raw materials, or long-term supply contracts.
No company can deliver everything it needs to function in-house. So, they need to source suppliers to provide anything and everything from raw materials to logistics. When done correctly, procurement can help organisations:
Efficient procurement process is important since poor supplier decisions can create lasting commercial and operational problems.
Procurement works best when it isn’t siloed to a single person. Even when a dedicated procurement manager leads the process, it helps to involve multiple people in the final decision.
Some of the main parties involved across the entire procurement lifecycle include:
Effective procurement depends on internal alignment among these groups. Before opening discussions with any potential suppliers, it’s worth negotiating internally to understand what really matters for the business.
Procurement negotiation should consider the full shape of the deal, not just the upfront price. By identifying where value can be created, protected, or traded, organisations can find more useful areas to negotiate.
Some of the main reasons for procurement negotiations highlighted by Chartered Institute of Procurement & Supply include:
There are two main types of procurement, with each one focusing on different priorities, risks, and negotiation opportunities. Understanding the differences is important, as many organisations use a combination of procurement types to acquire the goods and services they need. They include:
Direct procurement is the sourcing of goods, materials, or components that are directly used in producing a company’s products or services. It often involves balancing cost, quality, availability, and supplier reliability. Direct procurement covers any components that go into a finished product, including:
Indirect procurement is a way to secure services not used in manufacturing but that support production and day-to-day operations. This form of services procurement may not directly generate revenue, but it helps the business operate effectively. Some examples include:
Every procurement process is different, shaped by what the organisation requires and the overall contract value. That said, procurement generally follows a similar sequence, which is:
The procurement process begins with identifying what the organisation needs. This should typically cover why the purchase is necessary, the desired outcome, the budget, and any constraints.
Specifications outline what the supplier will provide. This can cover technical requirements, supplier performance expectations, delivery timelines, supply chain management, and other key areas or metrics.
Before approaching suppliers, the business should understand what the market can offer. This may involve reviewing existing suppliers, identifying new providers, benchmarking costs, and assessing availability for strategic sourcing.
Depending on the size and complexity of the purchasing process, the buyer may ask potential suppliers to submit a quotation, proposal, or formal tender. This stage allows suppliers to explain what they can deliver, how they would deliver it, and on what terms.
Supplier responses are then assessed against agreed criteria. These criteria should cover price, quality, experience, operational efficiency, delivery capability, risk, and contractual terms.
As part of negotiation preparations, it’s useful to consider a backup plan in case talks stall. This is known as a Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA), and is a way to handle an impasse during negotiations. If an organisation can’t reach an agreement with its chosen supplier, then a BATNA is the next best available option. This could mean approaching alternative suppliers from the shortlist, extending an existing contract, or delaying the purchase, to name a few.
Once preferred suppliers are identified, it’s time to negotiate. Negotiations can cover pricing, payment terms, service levels, delivery timelines, contract length, risk allocation, and other aspects of the contract.
After negotiation, the contract is awarded to the chosen supplier. At this stage, the agreement should be clearly documented so both sides understand what has been agreed.
Procurement can create major value and cost savings, but there are often challenges along the way. Many of these hurdles appear before the final negotiation even begins, which means preparation and procurement management are key. Common challenges include:
Without clear requirement definitions, suppliers may respond with unsuitable proposals. This can waste time, create poor comparisons, and lead to weaker contracts.
To prepare, procurement teams should define the must-haves, nice-to-haves, success criteria, and decision-making process before engaging suppliers. The clearer the brief, the easier it becomes to compare proposals and negotiate from a strong position.
As we touched on earlier, negotiating prices is important, but it is certainly not the only measure of value. A low-cost supplier may end up being expensive if they miss deadlines, fail to meet quality standards, or need constant vendor management.
Buyers should look beyond headline cost control and consider total value. This might include service levels, delivery reliability, flexibility, risk, innovation, aftercare, and long-term fit. Setting these criteria early helps avoid decisions based on price alone.
Procurement department often needs to balance competing priorities across teams. Without agreeing on these priorities early, the process can quickly become confusing.
A good way to address this is to involve key stakeholders before going to market. Agree on objectives, non-negotiables, trade-offs, and decision rights. This helps the procurement team stay focused and reduces the risk of late-stage disagreements.
Good negotiation depends on good information. If the buyer does not understand the supplier market, typical pricing, delivery constraints, or alternative options, they may enter the negotiation at a disadvantage.
To avoid this, procurement teams should conduct market research, benchmark pricing where possible, assess supplier strengths and weaknesses, and understand where they have genuine leverage. The same applies to suppliers; if they do not understand the buyer’s priorities, they may pitch the wrong value.
This research also helps buyers understand their BATNA, so they know what realistic alternatives are available if the preferred agreement cannot be reached.
One of the most common procurement negotiation mistakes is making concessions without receiving anything in return. In negotiation, movement should be conditional. If one side gives something, they should look for something in return.
To plan for this, buyers should plan their concessions carefully. Know where flexibility lies, where it doesn’t, and what to ask for in exchange. This makes it easier to protect value during the negotiation rather than giving ground too quickly.
The NHS National Programme for IT was launched in 2002 with an ambitious goal of reforming how the NHS in England used patient information. The programme aimed to create a more connected digital health system, including electronic patient records that could be accessed across different parts of the NHS.
The programme soon became associated with delays, implementation problems, and difficulties delivering systems that met the needs of NHS organisations. One of the core issues was that the programme was highly centralised, while the NHS itself is made up of many different organisations with different ways of working. This made it difficult to define requirements during procurement that worked across the full system.
Over time, the gap between the original ambition and what could realistically be delivered became clear. The UK Government announced the acceleration of the programme’s dismantling in 2011, following a review by the Cabinet Office’s Major Projects Authority. The Public Accounts Committee later stated that the original vision for the programme would not be realised, and that the NHS was receiving far fewer systems than planned, despite contractors being paid almost the same amount.
The programme is often associated with a cost of around £10 billion, with the Department of Health estimating final costs of £9.8 billion for programmes previously managed under NPfIT. However, it was not a complete write-off: some systems were delivered, while others were delayed, reduced in scope, or failed to meet the original ambition.
Three key lessons:
Every procurement process involves choices. Some are about price, but many are about value, risk, service, timing, and long-term performance.
Strong procurement negotiation helps organisations make those choices with greater control. It allows teams to prepare more effectively, understand supplier priorities, trade rather than concede, and reach agreements that can be delivered in practice.
Scotwork helps procurement teams prepare with clarity, trade with purpose, and protect value under pressure. Speak to us about building the negotiation skills your team needs before the next supplier conversation begins.
By The Scotwork Team | 22.01.26
Last week I revisited some of the tactical haggling we’ve been gawping at recently, concerning…
By The Scotwork Team | 15.01.26
Last January, prior to Donald Trump’s second coming as US President, I mulled his preference…
By The Scotwork Team | 08.01.26
Anyone who has negotiated for a while learns a simple rule: Actions speak louder than…